Tuesday, December 31, 2013

Taylor Swift Rebuilds Seaside Wall at Rhode Island Home, Locals Angered by Repairs

Taylor SwiftWENN.com
Listen, Rhode Islanders, Imma let you finish, butTaylor Swift is one of the best neighbors of all time.
There's been some misguided anger towards the 24-year-old country-pop singer for rebuilding a sea wall outside of her beachfront Westerly, R.I., home. One opinion column claimed the construction was being done on a "public" beach without "one single permit from the town," but Laura Dwyer, a spokeswoman for the Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council, told The Westerly Sun Swift's "riprap revetment repair" is A-OK--and yes, proper permits were obtained. 


"It all started during [Hurricane] Sandy," Dwyer told the paper. "The wall sustained damage during Sandy." She confirmed that on Nov. 6 permits were issued to Swift for repairs on the stone wall (replacing unsafe rocks and resettling existing rocks), adding that the construction being done is "a permitted activity." 
And locals needn't worry, because Swift's sea wall won't be preventing them from accessing their beloved East Beach. "There must be access at all times [during construction]," Dwyer said. "We made sure of that."
Westerly's director of planning, code enforcement and grant administration, Amy Grzybowski, confirmed that town officials are aware of Swift's construction. 
Let's hope Swift's Northern neighbors come around. Swift's Southern neighbors have nothing but love for the Nashville-based beauty. In fact, she was just named 2013 Tennessean of the Year.
Rhode Island, just remember, it's never too late to be brand new!

Missouri Bar Responds To Cease And Desist From Starbucks With Epic Letter And $6 Check

Missouri Bar Responds To Cease And Desist From Starbucks With Epic Letter And $6 Check
When one of the largest companies in the United States serves you a “cease and desist” letter, there are various ways to approach it.
One way is to give in to any demands in fear of powerful lawyers and millions or billions of dollars, forgetting whatever you were doing that got you in that predicament in the first place.
The other option is to write a mocking apology letter and send a check for an extremely small amount of cash to prove a point.
The Exit Six Pub and Brewery in Cottleville, Missouri, chose the latter, taking on the coffee behemoth that isStarbucks.
So what would turn the two unlikely entities into enemies? Exit Six was serving a beer called “Frappicino,” which bears quite a similar name to Starbucks’ signature coffee drink, the Frappucino.
Starbucks sent Exit Six a cease and desist letter, to which Exit Six replied with this Facebook post on Thursday:
“So quick little story. Last week I received a cease and desist letter from the attorneys at Starbucks. Apparently there was a beer on Untappd that someone named ‘Frappicino.’ 3 people had checked into said beer. 3.
“Starbucks did not like that. So I got a letter. They wanted me to remove the beer and promise never to use their names again. They also wanted my written response and guarantee. Here is their letter. And also my response.”
The response is an epic one, coupled with a $6 check for damages Starbucks may have suffered due to the debacle. It’s awesome seeing people react against ridiculous legal action the right way.
Starbucks-1
Starbucks-2
Exit-6-1
Exit-6-2
906206_707781272574113_105803906_o
Beer Pulse
Via: Beer Pulse, Top Photo Courtesy: Tumblr

The Famous Hand-Holding Couple Of Instagram Is Back With New Adventures Around The World (Photos)

The Famous Hand-Holding Couple Of Instagram Is Back With New Adventures Around The World (Photos)
The couple that plans to travel the entire world is back with another amazing photo collection. Photographer Murad Osmann and his girlfriend are known for being anywhere but home and having the photos to prove it. Osmann takes photos of his girlfriend facing where they are, but never shows their faces in any of the photos.
The project is called “Follow Me To.” Destinations in the latest edition include Monaco, the Versace mansion in Miami and the Crystal Palace in Madrid. Check out the photos below.

Eze, France


Corrida, Spain


Times Square, NYC


Kings Cross Station, London


Crystal Palace, Madrid, Spain


Alhambra, Granada


Benidorm, Spain


Madrid, Spain


Barcelona, Spain


Central Park, NYC


Blue Mosque, Istanbul, Turkey


Monaco


Leandro Erlich Installation, East London


Versace Mansion, Miami, Florida


Casa Mila, Barcelona, Spain

H/T: WhuDat, Photos courtesy of Instagram/Murad Osmann

Sunday, December 29, 2013

This Video Will Make You Completely Rethink What Your Concept Of Time Is


You might think this workweek is dragging on, and you may be counting down until the weekend, but what you might not realize is how insignificant this matter of time is.
In order to prove how trivial this period of time is, the good folks at the YouTube channel Kurzgesagt (the people who brought you this video about fracking) are back at it with a mind-blowing video, showing just how our perspective of time is irrational.
When you hear about “billions of years,” it’s hard to visualize, so this video takes familiar periods of time to show just how much time has passed, and how it’s important to make the best of the very short amount of time we have on earth.
Make sure to live it up because you don’t know when your time will be up!

Saturday, December 28, 2013

The 7 Essential Lessons About Selfies From The King Of The Trend, James Franco

The 7 Essential Lessons About Selfies From The King Of The Trend, James Franco
Whether you like it or not, selfies have become an international phenomenon. They plague our Instagram feeds and force us to question the future of humanity. Oxford dictionary has even gone so far as to declare selfie the world of 2013! Jesus effing Christ — what is happening to us? When did it become socially acceptable to become this vain?
I’ll bet you think this post is about you. Don’t you? Don’t you?
Well, it’s time for all to hail James Franco and his incessant selfie uploads as the star recently took to the NY Times to express himself about his new favorite pastime. He tries to teach valuable lessons throughout his article and shed light on this never-going-away fad.
Let’s take a look at what we learned about selfies through the knowledge imparted by James Franco.

1. Selfies get your more followers.

Evidently, selfies gain more followers and honestly that can be true. I know I follow certain people on Instagram just to laugh at their selfies — I can’t be the only person out there who does that. Franco has other motives backing this reason, believing it gives you a way to see the user in a different way.

2. Selfies get you more “likes.”

Posting a selfie shows courage and bravery! Doesn’t it? “The likes spin out of control for selfies of me and my two handsome brothers, especially Dave, the other actor, whose image pulls in its own legion of teenage fans.”

3. “Photos of art projects; videos telling the haters to go away (in not so many words); and photos with poems” will make you lose followers

So basically, Franco figured out what will and what won’t get you the attention you want from your Instagram uploads. Don’t post the homemade birdhouse you built for your brother for Christmas and definitely do not post any poems you’ve written in English class.

4. Attention is power.

In this day and age, it’s not about looks, it’s about likes. The more likes you have the more power over your peers you have — at least that’s what James Franco is trying to explain.

5. The one-for-one phenomenon.

Franco made a great point in his article, “for every photo of a book, painting or poem, I try to post a selfie with a puppy, a topless selfie or a selfie with Seth Rogen, because these are all things that are generally liked.”

6. Shows what you’re doing in real time.

As Franco so eloquently put it, “Selfies are tools of communication more than marks of vanity.”  The selfie allows people to express how they feel and what they’re doing in one image rather than via verbal communication.

7. Great introduction.

Franco actually becomes upset when an account he looks at doesn’t have any selfies. Why? Because he doesn’t feel as if he can garner a true sense of who this person is.
Via NY Times, Top Photo Courtesy: Instagram

Alabaman Politician Suggests Legislation In Support Of ‘Duck Dynasty,’ Because Of Course He Did

Alabaman Politician Suggests Legislation In Support Of ‘Duck Dynasty,’ Because Of Course He Did
State Senator Jerry Fielding (you know which party) has proposed a resolution to the Alabaman state legislature that makes no new laws, enacts no change to existing code, and has ZERO policy impact. So, it is of crucial importance to the state of the State for this issue to be addressed.
Sen. Fielding has suggested that the State of Alabama join him (and a large swath of the US) in condemning A&E for suspending Phil Robertson, the patriarch of the “Duck Dynasty” clan, for his Rorschach comments to GQ.
Now, I call Robertson’s comments “Rorschach” because there is nothing I can say here that will change your mind one way or the other. You already have your opinion, and it’s likely different from mine.
But the honorable Senator thinks that the state should waste precious legislative floor time and taxpayers’ dollars to ratify a statement condoning the… ahh.. “unfortunate” comments of a Louisiana native who has been interpreted as being racist and homophobic.
Said Sen. Fielding, reported by The Daily Home:
“Phil Robertson’s family values are shared by the vast majority of Alabamians, who are rightfully concerned by the vitriol aimed at his Christian stance.There’s a clear double standard in the media favoring a liberal worldview. When it’s used to silence and punish Christians for stating their beliefs, that’s when we must defend the rights of individuals to exercise their free speech without fear of politically-motivated repercussion.I join thousands across Alabama and our country by standing with Phil Robertson, and urge A&E to reverse their action against him.”
So, as I understand it, Fielding wants Alabama as a state to officially agree with comments containing thinly veiled bigotry and to scold a company for disassociating itself from an employee who holds such views.
The company is well within its rights to suspend an employee who acts in a manner that they feel disgraces their company (which is in violation of contract).
It’s foolish for this to become an Alabaman political issue when A&E has almost no economic footprint in the state. And going forwards, comparing homosexuality to bestiality and saying that black people were happy during the Jim Crow era are probably things to stay away from during an interview with a nationally syndicated magazine.
There is no persecution of Christian beliefs — had Robertson left it at, for instance, “my religious beliefs forbid me from accepting the sin of homosexuality, though I believe Christ would want me to share brotherly love with someone who is gay,” there would have been no problems.
I know that Robertson says that his family treats everyone with love, but creating hateful comparisons in the same paragraph will undermine that aspect of your message.
In my opinion, the only purpose Senator Fielding’s proposal to the Alabama State legislature serves is to make him more popular with his voting base.
He is gaining a little extra job security by talking about how the Christians of this country are being persecuted, ignoring how the LGBT community has been marginalized forever and still experiences hate daily.
Via: The Daily Home, Top Photo Courtesy: Wallup

This Open Letter To The Makers Of ‘The Wolf Of Wall Street’ Will Change Your Perspective On The Film

This Open Letter To The Makers Of ‘The Wolf Of Wall Street’ Will Change Your Perspective On The Film
A daughter of a former business partner of the real Wolf of Wall Street has penned an open letter to L.A. Weekly to alert movie-goers of the part of Jordan Belfort‘s story Martin Scorsese chose not to include in his film: the effect his crimes had on the families of the investors involved.
The girl’s name is Christina McDowell, and she was just a freshman in college when she attended the trial of her father,Tom Prousalis.
Jordan Belfort, played by Leonardo DiCaprio, is described as the government’s “star witness” to testify against Prousalis. Belfort had just pleaded guilty to money-laundering and securities fraud, and would go on to avoid years of jail time by ratting on a whole slew of criminals similar to himself.
As McDowell writes, Prousalis and Belfort “were in cahoots together with a list of ‘seemingly innocuous, legitimate companies’ that did not actually exist yet were all taken public to con unsuspecting investors and make the pair along with many others at Stratton Oakmont Inc. millions of dollars richer.”
The letter then takes an ugly turn as McDowell describes the day her father went to prison.
She recalls her mother locking herself in the bathroom and throwing up, not only because her husband was going under but because he had taken the family down with him.
Prousalis laundered money in his daughter’s name and hid what was left of the family’s assets in a Wells Fargo account.
McDowell, just 18, was receiving multiple phone calls from creditors and investors threatening to sue her. Her father had also left her her nearly $100,000 worth of debt.
The family was left almost penniless after the entire Wells Fargo account was liquidated. Her younger sister ran away at 17, and McDowell lived on other people’s couches and out of her car for roughly two years.
Starving and ashamed, McDowell barely survived on tips from her restaurant job. She even had to change her name because her father technically stole her identity by setting up the aforementioned account.
“It’s a pretty confusing experience to go from flying private with Dad to an evening where he’s begging you for a piece of your paycheck so he can buy food for dinner,” she writes.
The worst part, McDowell says, is that she still believed her father was innocent and that the government and Belfort were the bad guys.
“I believed that by taking out all those credit cards in my name, my father was attempting to save me. I believed him when he got out, and when he told me everything would be OK. I believed him until he tried to do the same thing all over again — until I was at risk of being arrested myself (and I’m saving that story for the memoir).”
McDowell then lays into the director and actors of “The Wolf of Wall Street” for painting such a positive picture of Stratton Oakmont and leaving out what these people and their co-conspirators did to their families and clients.
She calls Martin Scorsese “dangerous” for making movie-goers believe that Jordan Belfort was not an evil human being, and that his schemes are entertaining rather than the real-life tragedies.
“Come on, we know the truth,” she says. “This kind of behavior brought America to its knees.”
McDowell labels lead actor Leonardo DiCaprio a disgusting hypocrite for claiming to be a model humanitarian who then glorifies Belfort’s crimes as well as the film’s frequent misogyny.
“Did you think about the cultural message you’d be sending when you decided to make this film?” she asks.
“You have successfully aligned yourself with an accomplished criminal, a guy who still hasn’t made full restitution to his victims, exacerbating our national obsession with wealth and status and glorifying greed and psychopathic behavior.”
McDowell sees Belfort’s true face because she was exposed to the same luxuries and privileges he was. She drove a Range Rover in high school, “snorted half of Colombia,” and got every guy she wanted because her father would regularly take them for rides in his private planes.
But then she discovered who her father really was: a cruel, soulless money addict obsessed with wealth and fame. Scorsese’s film makes Belfort look like a good person underneath, but McDowell is positive that like her father, he’s less of a man than the homeless guy they pass on the street every day.
Some of McDowell’s father’s victims lost everything. They cannot afford to send their kids to college, pay their medical bills, and will struggle to pay off their debts until they are dead.
“Let me ask you guys something,” McDowell writes as her letter comes to a close.
“What makes you think this man deserves to be the protagonist in this story? Do you think his victims are going to want to watch it? Did we forget about the damage that accompanied all those rollicking good times? Or are we sweeping it under the carpet for the sale of a movie ticket? And not just on any day, but on Christmas morning?”

McDowell ends by urging us not to support “The Wolf of Wall Street” because it only provokes people like Belfort to go even farther with their crimes. The film lacks the reality of their wrongdoings, she says, and every time we celebrate Scorsese’s film, the more wolves we help create.
Via: LA Weekly, Top Photo Courtesy: Screencrush